<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 291 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338591</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the addition of unexplained cash deposits and emphasizing the acceptance of the peak credit balance surrendered by the assessee. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering the nature of business activities and the absence of proper accounting records while assessing cash deposits in bank accounts for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 10:23:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 291 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338591</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the addition of unexplained cash deposits and emphasizing the acceptance of the peak credit balance surrendered by the assessee. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering the nature of business activities and the absence of proper accounting records while assessing cash deposits in bank accounts for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>