https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190150 The Court directed the assessing officer to re-assess a bill of entry, rectify errors, and provide a refund with interest following the appellate authority's directions. Despite procedural defects in the petitioner's appeal to CESTAT, the Commissioner of Customs' order stood. The assessing officer was instructed to comply with the appellate authority's directions issued in July 2013 within three weeks. The Court emphasized strict adherence to the directions during re-assessment, disposing of the writ petition without costs to either party. en-us Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2017 09:40:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190150 The Court directed the assessing officer to re-assess a bill of entry, rectify errors, and provide a refund with interest following the appellate authority's directions. Despite procedural defects in the petitioner's appeal to CESTAT, the Commissioner of Customs' order stood. The assessing officer was instructed to comply with the appellate authority's directions issued in July 2013 within three weeks. The Court emphasized strict adherence to the directions during re-assessment, disposing of the writ petition without costs to either party. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190150