https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190152 The Court quashed the lookout notice issued against the petitioner after the detention order was invalidated. The Court found that the continued operation of the lookout notice infringed the petitioner's rights, especially considering the lack of statutory basis post the quashing of the detention order. Despite the petitioner's actions, the Court emphasized that the lookout notice was unauthorized by law and caused undue harassment, ordering its quashing in favor of the petitioner. The Court highlighted that lack of cooperation post-adjudication could not justify unauthorized actions, ensuring the petitioner's rights were upheld. en-us Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2017 09:40:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190152 The Court quashed the lookout notice issued against the petitioner after the detention order was invalidated. The Court found that the continued operation of the lookout notice infringed the petitioner's rights, especially considering the lack of statutory basis post the quashing of the detention order. Despite the petitioner's actions, the Court emphasized that the lookout notice was unauthorized by law and caused undue harassment, ordering its quashing in favor of the petitioner. The Court highlighted that lack of cooperation post-adjudication could not justify unauthorized actions, ensuring the petitioner's rights were upheld. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190152