https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190161 The Court found that the petitioner had the opportunity to present their case before the Commissioner regarding the remission of excise duty. The Commissioner rejected the remission application due to lack of evidence supporting the claim. The Court advised the petitioners to appeal to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal for remedy, emphasizing that the Writ Court is not a fact-finding court. The Court disposed of the writ application, permitting the appeal to the Tribunal if filed within the specified timeframe. en-us Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2017 09:40:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190161 The Court found that the petitioner had the opportunity to present their case before the Commissioner regarding the remission of excise duty. The Commissioner rejected the remission application due to lack of evidence supporting the claim. The Court advised the petitioners to appeal to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal for remedy, emphasizing that the Writ Court is not a fact-finding court. The Court disposed of the writ application, permitting the appeal to the Tribunal if filed within the specified timeframe. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190161