<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 270 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338570</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court noted that the assessee had not been heard when the impugned judgment was delivered, and that the earlier review petition had already been rejected. On that procedural ground, the appellate court set aside the impugned judgment and remitted the matters to the High Court for a fresh hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 15:25:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 270 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338570</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court noted that the assessee had not been heard when the impugned judgment was delivered, and that the earlier review petition had already been rejected. On that procedural ground, the appellate court set aside the impugned judgment and remitted the matters to the High Court for a fresh hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>