<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 266 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338566</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of unexplained cash credits for M/s. Wall Street and M/s. Novel, as their financial capacity and transactions were found genuine. However, the addition related to M/s. Ganesh was deleted as the Tribunal found the transactions genuine based on the evidence provided by the assessee. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed. The order was pronounced on 30/11/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 266 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338566</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of unexplained cash credits for M/s. Wall Street and M/s. Novel, as their financial capacity and transactions were found genuine. However, the addition related to M/s. Ganesh was deleted as the Tribunal found the transactions genuine based on the evidence provided by the assessee. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed. The order was pronounced on 30/11/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>