<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 243 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338543</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in favor of the Respondent-assessee, allowing the admissibility of CENVAT credit on plastic wire scrap and denying the denial of credit on the copper portion of inputs. The Tribunal emphasized that duty paid on the final product should be considered as a reversal of ineligible credit on inputs, following established legal precedents. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were rejected, and the impugned order denying credit was set aside, as more duty had been paid on the copper waste than the credit sought to be denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 243 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338543</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in favor of the Respondent-assessee, allowing the admissibility of CENVAT credit on plastic wire scrap and denying the denial of credit on the copper portion of inputs. The Tribunal emphasized that duty paid on the final product should be considered as a reversal of ineligible credit on inputs, following established legal precedents. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were rejected, and the impugned order denying credit was set aside, as more duty had been paid on the copper waste than the credit sought to be denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>