<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (8) TMI 7 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6691</link>
    <description>Whether interest on borrowed funds is deductible depends on whether the capital was actually borrowed for and employed in the taxpayer&#039;s business; where borrowings were diverted to partners&#039; personal accounts, used to pay taxes or meet liabilities of a related concern, or the firm had ceased the relevant business, interest on such diverted or never-utilised amounts is not allowable - firm&#039;s disallowance upheld. Likewise, partners cannot claim that portion as individual deductions where the funds originated from the firm, the partners were not carrying on the relevant business, dividends and benefits accrued to them personally, and the debited interest did not constitute an enforceable liability - individual claims rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (8) TMI 7 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6691</link>
      <description>Whether interest on borrowed funds is deductible depends on whether the capital was actually borrowed for and employed in the taxpayer&#039;s business; where borrowings were diverted to partners&#039; personal accounts, used to pay taxes or meet liabilities of a related concern, or the firm had ceased the relevant business, interest on such diverted or never-utilised amounts is not allowable - firm&#039;s disallowance upheld. Likewise, partners cannot claim that portion as individual deductions where the funds originated from the firm, the partners were not carrying on the relevant business, dividends and benefits accrued to them personally, and the debited interest did not constitute an enforceable liability - individual claims rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>