<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 690 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190129</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court granted leave to the petitioner as the respondent did not appear despite being served. The case was presided over by Justices R.V. Raveendran and K.S. Radhakrishnan, with counsels for the petitioner including Mr. Mohan Parasaran, Mr. Fuzail A. Ayyubi, Mr. D.L. Chidananda, and Mr. B.V. Balaram Das. The High Court reference is from 2007 (1) TMI 138 - DELHI High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 10:11:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 690 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190129</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court granted leave to the petitioner as the respondent did not appear despite being served. The case was presided over by Justices R.V. Raveendran and K.S. Radhakrishnan, with counsels for the petitioner including Mr. Mohan Parasaran, Mr. Fuzail A. Ayyubi, Mr. D.L. Chidananda, and Mr. B.V. Balaram Das. The High Court reference is from 2007 (1) TMI 138 - DELHI High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>