<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1067 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190118</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta dismissed a writ petition challenging a non-speaking order of assessment by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs Export Department under section 17(5) of the Customs Act. The petitioner&#039;s request for speaking orders regarding shipping bills was deemed untimely, as it was made a year after goods clearance and duty payment. The Court emphasized the importance of timely requests for speaking orders to ensure a fair appeal process, leading to the dismissal of the petition due to delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 18:29:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1067 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190118</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta dismissed a writ petition challenging a non-speaking order of assessment by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs Export Department under section 17(5) of the Customs Act. The petitioner&#039;s request for speaking orders regarding shipping bills was deemed untimely, as it was made a year after goods clearance and duty payment. The Court emphasized the importance of timely requests for speaking orders to ensure a fair appeal process, leading to the dismissal of the petition due to delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>