<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (5) TMI 2 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6688</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled in a case concerning the valuation of opening stock for income tax assessment. The court held that the assessee&#039;s method of valuing opening stock at market rate and closing stock at cost price was correct. It emphasized the assessee&#039;s right to choose between market price and cost price for valuation. The revaluation of opening stock by the Income-tax Officer was deemed impermissible, and the court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the department to pay costs and fixing counsel&#039;s fee at Rs. 200. The judgment underscores the flexibility in valuation methods based on market conditions and commercial practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (5) TMI 2 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6688</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled in a case concerning the valuation of opening stock for income tax assessment. The court held that the assessee&#039;s method of valuing opening stock at market rate and closing stock at cost price was correct. It emphasized the assessee&#039;s right to choose between market price and cost price for valuation. The revaluation of opening stock by the Income-tax Officer was deemed impermissible, and the court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the department to pay costs and fixing counsel&#039;s fee at Rs. 200. The judgment underscores the flexibility in valuation methods based on market conditions and commercial practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>