https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190112 The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the petitioner's liability to pay central excise duty in the absence of remission granted by the competent authority. The petitioner failed to follow proper procedures for remission, leading to the rejection of their application by various authorities. The court emphasized the importance of obtaining remission through the appropriate channels and advised the petitioner to file a new application if desired. No costs were awarded in the case. en-us Mon, 01 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Feb 2017 17:12:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190112 The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the petitioner's liability to pay central excise duty in the absence of remission granted by the competent authority. The petitioner failed to follow proper procedures for remission, leading to the rejection of their application by various authorities. The court emphasized the importance of obtaining remission through the appropriate channels and advised the petitioner to file a new application if desired. No costs were awarded in the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 01 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190112