<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (1) TMI 41 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190101</link>
    <description>Appellate tax authorities under the Income-tax Act may confirm, modify, annul or set aside an assessment and may direct further enquiry or remand, but the power must be exercised judicially on recognised legal principles. A remand is justified where the record is inadequate for a proper decision, material issues remain unresolved, accounts contain discrepancies needing verification, or further investigation is required in the interests of justice. On the facts noted, the assessment record showed serious defects, unanswered matters required enquiry, and the assessee was to be given a proper opportunity. No clear abuse of discretion, miscarriage of justice, or legal impropriety in the remand was established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 15:08:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (1) TMI 41 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190101</link>
      <description>Appellate tax authorities under the Income-tax Act may confirm, modify, annul or set aside an assessment and may direct further enquiry or remand, but the power must be exercised judicially on recognised legal principles. A remand is justified where the record is inadequate for a proper decision, material issues remain unresolved, accounts contain discrepancies needing verification, or further investigation is required in the interests of justice. On the facts noted, the assessment record showed serious defects, unanswered matters required enquiry, and the assessee was to be given a proper opportunity. No clear abuse of discretion, miscarriage of justice, or legal impropriety in the remand was established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>