<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 910 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190096</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee due to the uncondoned delay in filing the appeal seeking registration as a public charitable institution under Section 12A(a) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to the limitation period and highlighted the Board&#039;s negligence and lack of genuine cause for the delay. The decision was based on legal precedents regarding the condonation of delay, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal without addressing the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 12:09:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 910 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190096</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee due to the uncondoned delay in filing the appeal seeking registration as a public charitable institution under Section 12A(a) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to the limitation period and highlighted the Board&#039;s negligence and lack of genuine cause for the delay. The decision was based on legal precedents regarding the condonation of delay, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal without addressing the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>