<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1511 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190095</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the assessee eligible for exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act due to fulfilling conditions under section 11(4A), supported by government approval, separate accounts, and lack of surplus funds. The High Court upheld this decision based on factual findings and account maintenance. Regarding the adjustment of deficit to surplus, the Court dismissed the appeal, citing a previous decision where a similar issue was settled against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 11:45:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1511 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190095</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the assessee eligible for exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act due to fulfilling conditions under section 11(4A), supported by government approval, separate accounts, and lack of surplus funds. The High Court upheld this decision based on factual findings and account maintenance. Regarding the adjustment of deficit to surplus, the Court dismissed the appeal, citing a previous decision where a similar issue was settled against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>