<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (9) TMI 7 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6683</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Appellate Tribunal erred in allowing a deduction based on the variance between depreciation under the Income-tax Act and the company&#039;s books. The court ruled against the assessee, awarding costs to the department. It was clarified that the Wealth-tax Officer can adjust depreciation claims if errors or omissions are demonstrated, but further depreciation cannot be claimed as a matter of right.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 05:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (9) TMI 7 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6683</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Appellate Tribunal erred in allowing a deduction based on the variance between depreciation under the Income-tax Act and the company&#039;s books. The court ruled against the assessee, awarding costs to the department. It was clarified that the Wealth-tax Officer can adjust depreciation claims if errors or omissions are demonstrated, but further depreciation cannot be claimed as a matter of right.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>