<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1239 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190091</link>
    <description>An appeal by a complainant under Section 378(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code lies only against an acquittal in a complaint case, so it was not maintainable where the accused had been convicted and sentenced. The earlier withdrawal of the appeal before the Sessions Court further confirmed the absence of a valid remedy under that provision. On sentence, the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is compensatory in character and does not require imprisonment; a fine up to twice the cheque amount is within the statutory range. As no special circumstances justified enhancement, the compensation-based sentence was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 10:32:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1239 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190091</link>
      <description>An appeal by a complainant under Section 378(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code lies only against an acquittal in a complaint case, so it was not maintainable where the accused had been convicted and sentenced. The earlier withdrawal of the appeal before the Sessions Court further confirmed the absence of a valid remedy under that provision. On sentence, the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is compensatory in character and does not require imprisonment; a fine up to twice the cheque amount is within the statutory range. As no special circumstances justified enhancement, the compensation-based sentence was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>