<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 217 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2010-11, emphasizing the importance of thorough investigations and the need for conclusive evidence before treating transactions as bogus. The case highlighted the significance of providing the assessee with opportunities to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses to ensure fair assessment practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 10:13:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 217 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2010-11, emphasizing the importance of thorough investigations and the need for conclusive evidence before treating transactions as bogus. The case highlighted the significance of providing the assessee with opportunities to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses to ensure fair assessment practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>