<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 214 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338514</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) appropriately considered the remand report and supporting documents, with no adverse comments from the AO during the remand proceedings. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions made under Sections 68 and 37(1), finding the CIT(A)&#039;s order to be sound.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 10:13:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 214 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338514</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) appropriately considered the remand report and supporting documents, with no adverse comments from the AO during the remand proceedings. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions made under Sections 68 and 37(1), finding the CIT(A)&#039;s order to be sound.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>