https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338501 The appeals were dismissed by the Tribunal on the ground of limitation. In one case, the appellant successfully argued that the limitation period should start from the date of receipt of the decision, not the date of the order, leading to the appeal being considered within time. In the other case, the appellant was given an opportunity to seek condonation for a minor delay due to a fire incident. The issue of whether the appeal should have been filed under the Finance Act or Central Excise Act was left open for the appellant to raise before the Commissioner (Appeals). The court directed further proceedings in accordance with its rulings. en-us Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338501 The appeals were dismissed by the Tribunal on the ground of limitation. In one case, the appellant successfully argued that the limitation period should start from the date of receipt of the decision, not the date of the order, leading to the appeal being considered within time. In the other case, the appellant was given an opportunity to seek condonation for a minor delay due to a fire incident. The issue of whether the appeal should have been filed under the Finance Act or Central Excise Act was left open for the appellant to raise before the Commissioner (Appeals). The court directed further proceedings in accordance with its rulings. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338501