<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (9) TMI 6 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6679</link>
    <description>The court determined that the assessee should be assessed as an individual rather than as a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) due to the nature of the jagir being a personal grant. Additionally, the compensation receivable from the jagir administrator was deemed as wealth assessable under the Wealth-tax Act, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities. The court ruled in favor of the department, requiring the assessee to pay the costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 05:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (9) TMI 6 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6679</link>
      <description>The court determined that the assessee should be assessed as an individual rather than as a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) due to the nature of the jagir being a personal grant. Additionally, the compensation receivable from the jagir administrator was deemed as wealth assessable under the Wealth-tax Act, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities. The court ruled in favor of the department, requiring the assessee to pay the costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>