https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338482 The High Court found a jurisdictional flaw in the officer's rank who passed the impugned order under Section 129 DD of the Customs Tax Act, 1962. Citing a precedent from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, the court agreed with the petitioner's argument that an officer of the same rank as the Commissioner of Appeals lacked jurisdiction to make such orders. Consequently, the High Court set aside the order, granting the Government of India eight weeks to issue a new order after addressing the issue. If corrective measures were not taken within the specified period, compliance with the Commissioner of Appeals' decision was required. en-us Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Feb 2017 08:41:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338482 The High Court found a jurisdictional flaw in the officer's rank who passed the impugned order under Section 129 DD of the Customs Tax Act, 1962. Citing a precedent from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, the court agreed with the petitioner's argument that an officer of the same rank as the Commissioner of Appeals lacked jurisdiction to make such orders. Consequently, the High Court set aside the order, granting the Government of India eight weeks to issue a new order after addressing the issue. If corrective measures were not taken within the specified period, compliance with the Commissioner of Appeals' decision was required. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338482