<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 170 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338470</link>
    <description>The Assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed in the case. The reopening of assessments under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act was deemed valid by the Tribunal based on tangible material received from the Sales Tax department. However, the addition under Section 69C for treating purchases as bogus was not upheld. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to conclusively prove the purchases were bogus and directed a 2% disallowance to address potential anomalies, considering the nature of the Assessee&#039;s business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2017 12:44:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 170 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338470</link>
      <description>The Assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed in the case. The reopening of assessments under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act was deemed valid by the Tribunal based on tangible material received from the Sales Tax department. However, the addition under Section 69C for treating purchases as bogus was not upheld. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to conclusively prove the purchases were bogus and directed a 2% disallowance to address potential anomalies, considering the nature of the Assessee&#039;s business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>