<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 165 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338465</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue and the cross objection of the assessee, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to annul the assessment under section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the conditions for invoking section 153C were not met as the seized material did not belong to the assessee. Therefore, the assessment was deemed invalid, and the merits of the addition were not addressed due to the annulment of the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2017 12:43:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 165 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338465</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue and the cross objection of the assessee, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to annul the assessment under section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the conditions for invoking section 153C were not met as the seized material did not belong to the assessee. Therefore, the assessment was deemed invalid, and the merits of the addition were not addressed due to the annulment of the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>