<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 163 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338463</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) based on the lack of evidence for concealment and inaccurate particulars of income, as per the provisions and precedents cited in the case. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2017 12:43:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 163 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338463</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) based on the lack of evidence for concealment and inaccurate particulars of income, as per the provisions and precedents cited in the case. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>