<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1238 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190082</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the date of import for customs duty payment is determined by Section 15 of the Customs Act, based on previous Supreme Court decisions. As the issue was settled in favor of the Revenue, the appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1238 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190082</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the date of import for customs duty payment is determined by Section 15 of the Customs Act, based on previous Supreme Court decisions. As the issue was settled in favor of the Revenue, the appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>