<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (1) TMI 4 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6662</link>
    <description>Joint cultivation by co-lessees and shared profit distribution can show an association of individuals for a common income-producing purpose, but taxability depends on whether the group holds the property in a legally recognised capacity. Here, the lands remained separately owned, and the pooling arrangement was limited to common cultivation under one manager with common accounts. Because the association did not own or hold the lands as owner, trustee, receiver, administrator, partner, company, or in any other recognised capacity, it was not a &quot;person&quot; within section 2(11) and could not be assessed as an association of individuals under the Agricultural Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (1) TMI 4 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6662</link>
      <description>Joint cultivation by co-lessees and shared profit distribution can show an association of individuals for a common income-producing purpose, but taxability depends on whether the group holds the property in a legally recognised capacity. Here, the lands remained separately owned, and the pooling arrangement was limited to common cultivation under one manager with common accounts. Because the association did not own or hold the lands as owner, trustee, receiver, administrator, partner, company, or in any other recognised capacity, it was not a &quot;person&quot; within section 2(11) and could not be assessed as an association of individuals under the Agricultural Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>