<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 121 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338421</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the impugned Notices under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were invalid and ordered them to be quashed and set aside. The Court emphasized that since the Assessing Officer had already examined the relevant issues during the scrutiny assessment, reopening the assessment based on the same grounds would amount to a mere change of opinion and was not permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2017 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 121 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338421</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the impugned Notices under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were invalid and ordered them to be quashed and set aside. The Court emphasized that since the Assessing Officer had already examined the relevant issues during the scrutiny assessment, reopening the assessment based on the same grounds would amount to a mere change of opinion and was not permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>