<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 119 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338419</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice issued under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, ruling in favor of the Revenue against the Assessee. The court emphasized the necessity for the Assessing Officer to have substantial evidence indicating income escapement to justify issuing such a notice. In this case, the undisclosed source of money justified the reassessment proceedings, leading to the dismissal of both appeals and affirming the legality of the notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 11:08:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 119 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338419</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice issued under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, ruling in favor of the Revenue against the Assessee. The court emphasized the necessity for the Assessing Officer to have substantial evidence indicating income escapement to justify issuing such a notice. In this case, the undisclosed source of money justified the reassessment proceedings, leading to the dismissal of both appeals and affirming the legality of the notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>