<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 107 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338407</link>
    <description>The ITAT confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to uphold the addition of Rs. 20,00,000 but delete the Rs. 41,95,100 addition for AY 2003-04, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal. For AY 2006-07, the ITAT agreed with the CIT(A) to reduce the estimated on-money receipts to Rs. 44,46,333, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. Regarding the validity of the revision order u/s 263 for AY 2004-05, the ITAT set aside the CIT&#039;s decision to levy a penalty, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 11:08:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 107 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338407</link>
      <description>The ITAT confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to uphold the addition of Rs. 20,00,000 but delete the Rs. 41,95,100 addition for AY 2003-04, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal. For AY 2006-07, the ITAT agreed with the CIT(A) to reduce the estimated on-money receipts to Rs. 44,46,333, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. Regarding the validity of the revision order u/s 263 for AY 2004-05, the ITAT set aside the CIT&#039;s decision to levy a penalty, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>