<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 105 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338405</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents in appeals by Revenue concerning Service tax evasion. Revenue alleged non-registration for Service tax due to jointly owned property rented out by the respondents. The Tribunal held that the respondents did not form an association of persons as each received rent individually, emphasizing the requirement of an agreement to establish such an association. As no such agreement existed, the appeals by Revenue were dismissed, granting consequential relief to the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 105 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338405</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents in appeals by Revenue concerning Service tax evasion. Revenue alleged non-registration for Service tax due to jointly owned property rented out by the respondents. The Tribunal held that the respondents did not form an association of persons as each received rent individually, emphasizing the requirement of an agreement to establish such an association. As no such agreement existed, the appeals by Revenue were dismissed, granting consequential relief to the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>