<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 92 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338392</link>
    <description>The judgment confirmed duty liabilities on the appellant for allegations of clandestine removal of stable bleaching powder and sale of waste goods, upholding penalties due to evidence and circumstantial findings. The appellant&#039;s arguments were refuted, and penalties were upheld for causing detriment to Revenue&#039;s interest. Another appellant involved in breaching the law was also penalized. Both appeals were dismissed, affirming duty liabilities and penalties imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 92 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338392</link>
      <description>The judgment confirmed duty liabilities on the appellant for allegations of clandestine removal of stable bleaching powder and sale of waste goods, upholding penalties due to evidence and circumstantial findings. The appellant&#039;s arguments were refuted, and penalties were upheld for causing detriment to Revenue&#039;s interest. Another appellant involved in breaching the law was also penalized. Both appeals were dismissed, affirming duty liabilities and penalties imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>