<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 89 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338389</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order in original, emphasizing the availability of a statutory appeal process. The court directed the petitioner to appeal before the appellate authority, allowing all contentions, including post-order events, to be raised during the appeal. The petitioner was granted four weeks to file the appeal, with the appellate authority instructed to consider the appeal on merits without factoring in the delay in filing. The judgment highlighted that the dismissal of the writ petition should not prevent the respondent from independently reviewing the matter in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded, and related miscellaneous petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 09:22:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 89 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338389</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order in original, emphasizing the availability of a statutory appeal process. The court directed the petitioner to appeal before the appellate authority, allowing all contentions, including post-order events, to be raised during the appeal. The petitioner was granted four weeks to file the appeal, with the appellate authority instructed to consider the appeal on merits without factoring in the delay in filing. The judgment highlighted that the dismissal of the writ petition should not prevent the respondent from independently reviewing the matter in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded, and related miscellaneous petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>