https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338385 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order revoking the CHA license, citing that the Commissioner had already revoked it in a previous order. The Tribunal found the revocation of an already revoked license to be incorrect and lacking proper application of mind. Additionally, the significant delay of almost six years in passing the order was considered detrimental to the proceedings, leading to the appeal being allowed. The Tribunal emphasized that inordinate delays in concluding proceedings against a CHA are unacceptable, ultimately declaring the impugned order as non est. en-us Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338385 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order revoking the CHA license, citing that the Commissioner had already revoked it in a previous order. The Tribunal found the revocation of an already revoked license to be incorrect and lacking proper application of mind. Additionally, the significant delay of almost six years in passing the order was considered detrimental to the proceedings, leading to the appeal being allowed. The Tribunal emphasized that inordinate delays in concluding proceedings against a CHA are unacceptable, ultimately declaring the impugned order as non est. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338385