https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338378 A joint venture agreement was found to have been duly executed, with Kanda & Associates treated as the named investor group rather than a separate corporate entity. Because the agreement contained an arbitration clause, the disputes were held referable to arbitration, and the parties were bound by the Supreme Court order appointing a sole arbitrator. The Tribunal further held that a company petition alleging oppression and mismanagement could not proceed in parallel on the same dispute matrix, as the claims arose from the implementation and alleged breach of the joint venture agreement. The company petition was rejected and the parties were directed to pursue arbitration. en-us Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Feb 2017 09:02:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338378 A joint venture agreement was found to have been duly executed, with Kanda & Associates treated as the named investor group rather than a separate corporate entity. Because the agreement contained an arbitration clause, the disputes were held referable to arbitration, and the parties were bound by the Supreme Court order appointing a sole arbitrator. The Tribunal further held that a company petition alleging oppression and mismanagement could not proceed in parallel on the same dispute matrix, as the claims arose from the implementation and alleged breach of the joint venture agreement. The company petition was rejected and the parties were directed to pursue arbitration. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338378