<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (1) TMI 361 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190061</link>
    <description>Delegated powers under the Essential Commodities Act must be exercised strictly within the limits and conditions imposed by the Central Government&#039;s delegation. Restrictions on interstate transport and export of groundnut seeds and oil required prior Central concurrence, while the relevant licensing and distribution order did not authorise compulsory levy, fixed-price supply to the State, or restrictions on interstate movement. A general directions clause could operate only within matters governed by that order and could not expand delegated authority. Directions imposing these restrictions, levies and undertakings therefore lacked legal sanction, were ultra vires and void, and could not be sustained through executive action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 17:45:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (1) TMI 361 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190061</link>
      <description>Delegated powers under the Essential Commodities Act must be exercised strictly within the limits and conditions imposed by the Central Government&#039;s delegation. Restrictions on interstate transport and export of groundnut seeds and oil required prior Central concurrence, while the relevant licensing and distribution order did not authorise compulsory levy, fixed-price supply to the State, or restrictions on interstate movement. A general directions clause could operate only within matters governed by that order and could not expand delegated authority. Directions imposing these restrictions, levies and undertakings therefore lacked legal sanction, were ultra vires and void, and could not be sustained through executive action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>