<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1050 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190055</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC clarified that the petitioner can have their lawyer present during interrogation by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, in line with SC rulings. The lawyer must be within hearing distance. The writ petition was disposed of following this clarification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 16:22:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1050 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190055</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC clarified that the petitioner can have their lawyer present during interrogation by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, in line with SC rulings. The lawyer must be within hearing distance. The writ petition was disposed of following this clarification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>