<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 64 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338364</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the service tax demand on laying down pipelines for drinking water supply, ruling that the services were not subject to service tax under Commercial or Industrial Construction Services. The decision emphasized that the primary purpose of the pipelines was for supplying water to citizens, not for commercial or industrial activities. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and penalties were not imposed, based on established legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 64 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338364</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the service tax demand on laying down pipelines for drinking water supply, ruling that the services were not subject to service tax under Commercial or Industrial Construction Services. The decision emphasized that the primary purpose of the pipelines was for supplying water to citizens, not for commercial or industrial activities. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and penalties were not imposed, based on established legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>