<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 55 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338355</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s four appeals, overturning the denial of CENVAT credit for service tax paid on renting immovable property in Mumbai. The Tribunal held that the rented property was directly related to the appellant&#039;s manufacturing activity, emphasizing the importance of regulatory activities conducted at the Mumbai office for their manufacturing operations in Bangalore. The Tribunal found that the regulatory work, licensing permissions obtained in Mumbai, and the technical engineers employed at the Mumbai office were integral to the manufacturing process, entitling the appellant to the CENVAT credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 07:05:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 55 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338355</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s four appeals, overturning the denial of CENVAT credit for service tax paid on renting immovable property in Mumbai. The Tribunal held that the rented property was directly related to the appellant&#039;s manufacturing activity, emphasizing the importance of regulatory activities conducted at the Mumbai office for their manufacturing operations in Bangalore. The Tribunal found that the regulatory work, licensing permissions obtained in Mumbai, and the technical engineers employed at the Mumbai office were integral to the manufacturing process, entitling the appellant to the CENVAT credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>