https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338352 The High Court held that the second respondent should have entertained the appeal challenging the penalty imposed on the exporter and the appellant under the Customs Act. The court set aside the dismissal based on pecuniary jurisdiction, emphasizing the potential impact on the appellant's license renewal. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration, directing the second respondent to decide on the appeal's merits. The court ruled in favor of the appellant, instructing the second respondent to follow the law in deciding the appeal without awarding costs. en-us Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Aug 2017 18:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338352 The High Court held that the second respondent should have entertained the appeal challenging the penalty imposed on the exporter and the appellant under the Customs Act. The court set aside the dismissal based on pecuniary jurisdiction, emphasizing the potential impact on the appellant's license renewal. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration, directing the second respondent to decide on the appeal's merits. The court ruled in favor of the appellant, instructing the second respondent to follow the law in deciding the appeal without awarding costs. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338352