<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 51 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338351</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming the fines imposed on the appellant/importer for violating the Standards of Weights and Measures Rules by not declaring Maximum Retail Price (MRP) on packaged goods. The Court emphasized the importance of MRP disclosure for consumer protection, rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments on profit distribution and prosecution deferment. The fines were deemed necessary to deter exploitation and uphold public interest, with the Court finding them reasonable and justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 51 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338351</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming the fines imposed on the appellant/importer for violating the Standards of Weights and Measures Rules by not declaring Maximum Retail Price (MRP) on packaged goods. The Court emphasized the importance of MRP disclosure for consumer protection, rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments on profit distribution and prosecution deferment. The fines were deemed necessary to deter exploitation and uphold public interest, with the Court finding them reasonable and justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>