<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 44 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338344</link>
    <description>The court found the reassessment order and refund calculation to be invalid due to discrepancies and failure to comply with legal requirements. It emphasized the petitioner&#039;s lack of opportunity for a fair hearing and proper record presentation. The court quashed the order and remanded the matter for reassessment within two months. Additionally, it ruled that the lack of a personal hearing for the petitioner was a critical flaw, emphasizing the mandatory nature of such hearings in reassessment cases. Compliance with legal requirements for reassessment, including providing a fair opportunity for the assessee, was deemed essential for a sustainable order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 06:40:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 44 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338344</link>
      <description>The court found the reassessment order and refund calculation to be invalid due to discrepancies and failure to comply with legal requirements. It emphasized the petitioner&#039;s lack of opportunity for a fair hearing and proper record presentation. The court quashed the order and remanded the matter for reassessment within two months. Additionally, it ruled that the lack of a personal hearing for the petitioner was a critical flaw, emphasizing the mandatory nature of such hearings in reassessment cases. Compliance with legal requirements for reassessment, including providing a fair opportunity for the assessee, was deemed essential for a sustainable order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>