<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (3) TMI 1 - PUNJAB High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6626</link>
    <description>Section 35(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 is described as a deeming provision allowing a partner&#039;s completed assessment to be adjusted where a later firm reassessment shows the partner&#039;s share was wrongly included. The text states that this provision, enacted in 1953, was not retrospective enough to disturb partner assessments that had already become final before 1 April 1952. It also notes that a mistake visible only from the firm&#039;s record is not a mistake apparent from the partner&#039;s completed assessment for rectification purposes. The stated effect is that such reopened assessments would lack jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (3) TMI 1 - PUNJAB High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6626</link>
      <description>Section 35(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 is described as a deeming provision allowing a partner&#039;s completed assessment to be adjusted where a later firm reassessment shows the partner&#039;s share was wrongly included. The text states that this provision, enacted in 1953, was not retrospective enough to disturb partner assessments that had already become final before 1 April 1952. It also notes that a mistake visible only from the firm&#039;s record is not a mistake apparent from the partner&#039;s completed assessment for rectification purposes. The stated effect is that such reopened assessments would lack jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>