<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (11) TMI 1 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6619</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that sub-section (1) of Section 21 of the Wealth-tax Act applied as the beneficiaries&#039; shares were known and determinate on the relevant valuation date. The court held that the Wealth-tax Officer&#039;s application of sub-section (4) was incorrect. The court ruled in favor of the assessee-trusts, awarding costs to the applicants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (11) TMI 1 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6619</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that sub-section (1) of Section 21 of the Wealth-tax Act applied as the beneficiaries&#039; shares were known and determinate on the relevant valuation date. The court held that the Wealth-tax Officer&#039;s application of sub-section (4) was incorrect. The court ruled in favor of the assessee-trusts, awarding costs to the applicants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>