https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190027 The appeals were allowed, and the judgment under appeal was set aside. The Court found the contentions of the Andhra Pradesh Government untenable in law and held that the recoveries sought were unlawful and unjust. The appellants were entitled to be paid the procurement price as per the 1975 Order until a new order was promulgated. The Court emphasized the statutory duty of the Government to pay for the rice procured at the market rate in the absence of an agreed or controlled price. en-us Tue, 25 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Feb 2017 12:26:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190027 The appeals were allowed, and the judgment under appeal was set aside. The Court found the contentions of the Andhra Pradesh Government untenable in law and held that the recoveries sought were unlawful and unjust. The appellants were entitled to be paid the procurement price as per the 1975 Order until a new order was promulgated. The Court emphasized the statutory duty of the Government to pay for the rice procured at the market rate in the absence of an agreed or controlled price. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190027