https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190026 An appeal is a continuation of the suit, so a rent-control protection that came into force while an eviction decree was under challenge applied to the pending appeal. Clause 13-A of the C.P. and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949 was therefore available to the tenant despite the decree already having been passed, because the matter remained sub judice in appeal. The amendments introducing clause 2(4-A) and clause 13-A were treated as prospective in form but operative for the future enforcement stage of an existing proceeding, and were not impermissibly retrospective. The contrary view was set aside and the tenant was entitled to invoke the amended protection. en-us Tue, 14 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Feb 2017 12:07:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190026 An appeal is a continuation of the suit, so a rent-control protection that came into force while an eviction decree was under challenge applied to the pending appeal. Clause 13-A of the C.P. and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949 was therefore available to the tenant despite the decree already having been passed, because the matter remained sub judice in appeal. The amendments introducing clause 2(4-A) and clause 13-A were treated as prospective in form but operative for the future enforcement stage of an existing proceeding, and were not impermissibly retrospective. The contrary view was set aside and the tenant was entitled to invoke the amended protection. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190026