<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2608 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190022</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the Review Petition filed by the Customs Department, recognizing their statutory right to appeal within the prescribed time. The Court concluded that there was no contempt as the appeal was filed within the statutory period. Parties were directed to participate in the appeal proceedings before the Tribunal, which was instructed to dispose of the appeal promptly. The Review Application and Contempt Petition were both disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 11:03:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2608 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190022</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the Review Petition filed by the Customs Department, recognizing their statutory right to appeal within the prescribed time. The Court concluded that there was no contempt as the appeal was filed within the statutory period. Parties were directed to participate in the appeal proceedings before the Tribunal, which was instructed to dispose of the appeal promptly. The Review Application and Contempt Petition were both disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>