<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 922 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190023</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of interest income from fixed deposits as &quot;income from other sources,&quot; impacting Section 10AA/10A deductions. It allowed netting of interest income against expenditure and ruled against disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) if payments were from own funds. Trading activities in SEZ were deemed eligible for Section 10AA deductions. Assessee&#039;s appeals were partially allowed, while the department&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 922 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190023</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of interest income from fixed deposits as &quot;income from other sources,&quot; impacting Section 10AA/10A deductions. It allowed netting of interest income against expenditure and ruled against disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) if payments were from own funds. Trading activities in SEZ were deemed eligible for Section 10AA deductions. Assessee&#039;s appeals were partially allowed, while the department&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>