https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338325 The appeal was filed by the assessee against the addition of Rs. 26,57,533 by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A). The assessee's failure to comply with notices and explain the cash deposit in the bank account led to the issuance of a notice under section 148. Despite opportunities, the assessee did not provide necessary information or comply with requests for documents. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order for reconsideration by the CIT(A) due to inadequate consideration of the assessee's written submissions, emphasizing the importance of fair compliance. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the adjournment petition was rejected. en-us Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jan 2017 06:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338325 The appeal was filed by the assessee against the addition of Rs. 26,57,533 by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A). The assessee's failure to comply with notices and explain the cash deposit in the bank account led to the issuance of a notice under section 148. Despite opportunities, the assessee did not provide necessary information or comply with requests for documents. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order for reconsideration by the CIT(A) due to inadequate consideration of the assessee's written submissions, emphasizing the importance of fair compliance. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the adjournment petition was rejected. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338325