https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338318 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant on the interpretation of input services, admissibility of CENVAT credit on specific services, and the application of time limitations for refund claims. The appellant was entitled to a refund of CENVAT credit for canteen services, general insurance services, and employees' health insurance, as these services were deemed as input services under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The Tribunal clarified the eligibility criteria and time limitations for claiming such refunds, ensuring a fair outcome based on legal principles and precedents. en-us Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Feb 2017 08:43:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338318 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant on the interpretation of input services, admissibility of CENVAT credit on specific services, and the application of time limitations for refund claims. The appellant was entitled to a refund of CENVAT credit for canteen services, general insurance services, and employees' health insurance, as these services were deemed as input services under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The Tribunal clarified the eligibility criteria and time limitations for claiming such refunds, ensuring a fair outcome based on legal principles and precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338318